![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
MIT discovered fandom! No wait, they call it a "co-viewing clique". A BNF is now, officially, according to the MIT computer-graphics-and-wordbarf-processing department, a ~"pro-amateur media critic"~.
Don't you all just feel so validated?
:')
But seriously, data wonks: somebody help me out here. The comments over there seem evenly split between awe and kudos for the sheer volume of data processed and/or the shiny visualizations created therefrom, and serious underwhelm-ment at the results. What exactly, other than discovering fandom*, has this guy done?
More to the point, and p'raps more fun to think about, what COULD he do? What would YOU do with all that linked data? It seems a bit like a 3D map of a web we all navigate, by years of practice that's made the moves instinctual to us but maybe completely foreign, to non-fen.
Think of how you might hear about, and then find, a piece of fanfic. Maybe somebody on your friendslist links it, but the link's broken, so you end up trawling FF.net or AO3 before you realize, wait, it must be posted on the kink meme! So off you go, and by the time you've read it (and six other fics in the same thread) you've forgotten how you got there. This data could, presumably, plot your course on a physical-seeming map...? but the practical applications of this, to me, are not evident.
It could also, I suppose, plot the course of a fanfic to all its readers? Marketers do this kind of data-mining in the hopes of better selling through statistics, but... otherwise, again, why?
*He could have walked down the hall to the MIT Anime Club. They could've at least told him what it's called.
Don't you all just feel so validated?
:')
But seriously, data wonks: somebody help me out here. The comments over there seem evenly split between awe and kudos for the sheer volume of data processed and/or the shiny visualizations created therefrom, and serious underwhelm-ment at the results. What exactly, other than discovering fandom*, has this guy done?
More to the point, and p'raps more fun to think about, what COULD he do? What would YOU do with all that linked data? It seems a bit like a 3D map of a web we all navigate, by years of practice that's made the moves instinctual to us but maybe completely foreign, to non-fen.
Think of how you might hear about, and then find, a piece of fanfic. Maybe somebody on your friendslist links it, but the link's broken, so you end up trawling FF.net or AO3 before you realize, wait, it must be posted on the kink meme! So off you go, and by the time you've read it (and six other fics in the same thread) you've forgotten how you got there. This data could, presumably, plot your course on a physical-seeming map...? but the practical applications of this, to me, are not evident.
It could also, I suppose, plot the course of a fanfic to all its readers? Marketers do this kind of data-mining in the hopes of better selling through statistics, but... otherwise, again, why?
*He could have walked down the hall to the MIT Anime Club. They could've at least told him what it's called.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-13 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-13 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-14 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-13 09:45 pm (UTC)(But seriously, if you're going to study fandom, do acknowledge that we have our own language, and we are an authority on, well, us.)
If they discover shipping next, I will bust a lung laughing.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 04:58 am (UTC)My sense is that rather than make a judgement on exclusivity in fandom, which would require a little more nuance and awareness than I think they've gained, (for all their data,) these clowns are just using 'clique' because 'group' sounds unscientific.
The thing is, they claim to be studying language. As if this is a study distinct from, say, literature and criticism and reaction and interaction. lol. Lern2interdiscipline, MIT linguists.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-21 02:51 am (UTC)Oh LOL, this. Think we can make it catch on? You can use it if you're an acafan, and also, you know, a complete asshat. XD
I agree with your interpretation... if they ever do gain more nuance and awareness, do you think they'll realize that fandom is self-aware?
Lern2interdiscipline, MIT linguists.
Aww, they're taking baby steps~ It's kinda cute...
no subject
Date: 2011-03-14 05:09 am (UTC)... So that real world people are acknowledging it is like seeing newscasters try to make youtube jokes. It's just. Odd. I have no idea what in the world they could do with this, but it's a bit freaky. )X
And also glad to hear that you're okay! I thought you were in New York, but wasn't sure... Please keep well, Lina. >:
no subject
Date: 2011-03-15 05:11 am (UTC)But I take offense to an academic identifying this barrier as a gerbil cage, and deciding we're on display. As if we have no self awareness, ffs.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-16 12:56 pm (UTC)It's actually nice to have papers like this because then when you mention fandom in your research (which I do) you can cite something "legit" and then people think you're less crazy.
Vaguely related: have you seen the help_japan fandom auction on lj?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-01 03:29 am (UTC)I have indeed. I've been watching a lot of relief effort and relief efficacy, and there's a lot to be rambled about. Soon.